Benchmarking Deep Learning Frameworks for Automated Diagnosis of Ocular Toxoplasmosis: A Comprehensive Approach to Classification and Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ocular Toxoplasmosis (OT), is a common eye infection caused by T. gondii that can cause vision problems. Diagnosis is typically done through a clinical examination and imaging, but these methods can be complicated and costly, requiring trained personnel. To address this issue, we have created a benchmark study that evaluates the effectiveness of existing pre-trained networks using transfer learning techniques to detect OT from fundus images. Furthermore, we have also analysed the performance of transfer-learning based segmentation networks to segment lesions in the images. This research seeks to provide a guide for future researchers looking to utilise DL techniques and develop a cheap, automated, easy-to-use, and accurate diagnostic method. We have performed in-depth analysis of different feature extraction techniques in order to find the most optimal one for OT classification and segmentation of lesions. For classification tasks, we have evaluated pre-trained models such as VGG16, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and DenseNet121 models. Among them, MobileNetV2 outperformed all other models in terms of Accuracy (Acc), Recall, and F1 Score outperforming the second-best model, InceptionV3 by 0.7% higher Acc. However, DenseNet121 achieved the best result in terms of Precision, which was 0.1% higher than MobileNetv2. For the segmentation task, this work has exploited U-Net architecture. In order to utilize transfer learning the encoder block of the traditional U-Net was replaced by MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, ResNet34, and VGG16 to evaluate different architectures moreover two different two different loss functions (Dice loss and Jaccard loss) were exploited in order to find the most optimal one. The MobileNetV2/U-Net outperformed ResNet34 by 0.5% and 2.1% in terms of Acc and Dice Score, respectively when Jaccard loss function is employed during the training.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.
Builds on
15 of 82 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
- 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 419
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 250
- 2017FreezeOut: Accelerate Training by Progressively Freezing Layerscited by 54
3 more
- 2018DeepSeeNet: A deep learning model for automated classification of patient-based age-related macular degeneration severity from color fundus photographscited by 22
- 2023NRC-Net: Automated noise robust cardio net for detecting valvular cardiac diseases using optimum transformation method with heart sound signalscited by 2
- 2022Deep Recurrent Learning for Heart Sounds Segmentation based on Instantaneous Frequency Featurescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.