mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the ISS Property of the Gradient Flow for Single Hidden-Layer Neural Networks with Linear Activations

arXiv 2305.09904 ↗First posted 17 May 2023cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research in neural networks and machine learning suggests that using many more parameters than strictly required by the initial complexity of a regression problem can result in more accurate or faster-converging models -- contrary to classical statistical belief. This phenomenon, sometimes known as ``benign overfitting'', raises questions regarding in what other ways might overparameterization affect the properties of a learning problem. In this work, we investigate the effects of overfitting on the robustness of gradient-descent training when subject to uncertainty on the gradient estimation. This uncertainty arises naturally if the gradient is estimated from noisy data or directly measured. Our object of study is a linear neural network with a single, arbitrarily wide, hidden layer and an arbitrary number of inputs and outputs. In this paper we solve the problem for the case where the input and output of our neural-network are one-dimensional, deriving sufficient conditions for robustness of our system based on necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence in the undisturbed case. We then show that the general overparametrized formulation introduces a set of spurious equilibria which lay outside the set where the loss function is minimized, and discuss directions of future work that might extend our current results for more general formulations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  2. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  4. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  5. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  6. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
  7. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
  8. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 322
  9. 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 284
  10. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  11. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 187
  12. 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 177
11 more
  1. 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
  2. 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 77
  3. 2022Benign Overfitting without Linearity: Neural Network Classifiers Trained by Gradient Descent for Noisy Linear Datacited by 74
  4. 2020How benign is benign overfitting?cited by 40
  5. 2020The Curious Case of Adversarially Robust Models: More Data Can Help, Double Descend, or Hurt Generalizationcited by 39
  6. 2016Gradient Descent Only Converges to Minimizers: Non-Isolated Critical Points and Invariant Regionscited by 34
  7. 2022Overparameterized Linear Regression under Adversarial Attackscited by 21
  8. 2020Training Linear Neural Networks: Non-Local Convergence and Complexity Resultscited by 19
  9. 2018A Geometric Approach of Gradient Descent Algorithms in Linear Neural Networkscited by 8
  10. 2021Remarks on input to state stability of perturbed gradient flows, motivated by model-free feedback control learningcited by 8
  11. 2019Extending the step-size restriction for gradient descent to avoid strict saddle pointscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.