mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tight and fast generalization error bound of graph embedding in metric space

arXiv 2305.07971 ↗First posted 13 May 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have experimentally shown that we can achieve in non-Euclidean metric space effective and efficient graph embedding, which aims to obtain the vertices' representations reflecting the graph's structure in the metric space. Specifically, graph embedding in hyperbolic space has experimentally succeeded in embedding graphs with hierarchical-tree structure, e.g., data in natural languages, social networks, and knowledge bases. However, recent theoretical analyses have shown a much higher upper bound on non-Euclidean graph embedding's generalization error than Euclidean one's, where a high generalization error indicates that the incompleteness and noise in the data can significantly damage learning performance. It implies that the existing bound cannot guarantee the success of graph embedding in non-Euclidean metric space in a practical training data size, which can prevent non-Euclidean graph embedding's application in real problems. This paper provides a novel upper bound of graph embedding's generalization error by evaluating the local Rademacher complexity of the model as a function set of the distances of representation couples. Our bound clarifies that the performance of graph embedding in non-Euclidean metric space, including hyperbolic space, is better than the existing upper bounds suggest. Specifically, our new upper bound is polynomial in the metric space's geometric radius R and can be O(frac1S) at the fastest, where S is the training data size. Our bound is significantly tighter and faster than the existing one, which can be exponential to R and O(frac1√S) at the fastest. Specific calculations on example cases show that graph embedding in non-Euclidean metric space can outperform that in Euclidean space with much smaller training data than the existing bound has suggested.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2023.

Builds on

21 of 63 references.

References · 21

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  5. 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 897
  6. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  7. 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
  8. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
  9. 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 393
  10. 2018Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddingscited by 204
  11. 2015Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphscited by 181
  12. 2018Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddingscited by 160
9 more
  1. 2018Poincar'e GloVe: Hyperbolic Word Embeddingscited by 155
  2. 2019Multi-relational Poincar'e Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  3. 2018Hyperbolic Attention Networkscited by 122
  4. 2015PTE: Predictive Text Embedding through Large-scale Heterogeneous Text Networkscited by 96
  5. 2017TorusE: Knowledge Graph Embedding on a Lie Groupcited by 36
  6. 2016Finite Sample Prediction and Recovery Bounds for Ordinal Embeddingcited by 12
  7. 2021Generalization Error Bound for Hyperbolic Ordinal Embeddingcited by 12
  8. 2017On the ERM Principle with Networked Datacited by 1
  9. 2018The Importance of Norm Regularization in Linear Graph Embedding: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Demonstrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.