mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Imitation versus Innovation: What children can do that large language and language-and-vision models cannot (yet)?

arXiv 2305.07666 ↗First posted 8 May 2023cs.AI cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Much discussion about large language models and language-and-vision models has focused on whether these models are intelligent agents. We present an alternative perspective. We argue that these artificial intelligence models are cultural technologies that enhance cultural transmission in the modern world, and are efficient imitation engines. We explore what AI models can tell us about imitation and innovation by evaluating their capacity to design new tools and discover novel causal structures, and contrast their responses with those of human children. Our work serves as a first step in determining which particular representations and competences, as well as which kinds of knowledge or skill, can be derived from particular learning techniques and data. Critically, our findings suggest that machines may need more than large scale language and images to achieve what a child can do.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2023.

Builds on

5 of 58 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
  3. 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 288
  4. 2020Are Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning IMPlicature and PRESuppositioncited by 76
  5. 2022Towards Understanding How Machines Can Learn Causal Overhypothesescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: