Uncertainty Estimation and Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction using the Local Lipschitz
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate image reconstruction is at the heart of diagnostics in medical imaging. Supervised deep learning-based approaches have been investigated for solving inverse problems including image reconstruction. However, these trained models encounter unseen data distributions that are widely shifted from training data during deployment. Therefore, it is essential to assess whether a given input falls within the training data distribution for diagnostic purposes. Uncertainty estimation approaches exist but focus on providing an uncertainty map to radiologists, rather than assessing the training distribution fit. In this work, we propose a method based on the local Lipschitz-based metric to distinguish out-of-distribution images from in-distribution with an area under the curve of 99.94%. Empirically, we demonstrate a very strong relationship between the local Lipschitz value and mean absolute error (MAE), supported by a high Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.8475, which determines the uncertainty estimation threshold for optimal model performance. Through the identification of false positives, the local Lipschitz and MAE relationship was used to guide data augmentation and reduce model uncertainty. Our study was validated using the AUTOMAP architecture for sensor-to-image Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reconstruction. We compare our proposed approach with baseline methods: Monte-Carlo dropout and deep ensembles, and further analysis included MRI denoising and Computed Tomography (CT) sparse-to-full view reconstruction using UNET architectures. We show that our approach is applicable to various architectures and learned functions, especially in the realm of medical image reconstruction, where preserving the diagnostic accuracy of reconstructed images remains paramount.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2023.
Builds on
39 of 63 references.
References · 39
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 464
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 431
- 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 340
- 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
- 2017Image reconstruction by domain transform manifold learningcited by 231
- 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
27 more
- 2015Compression Artifacts Reduction by a Deep Convolutional Networkcited by 136
- 2020Training robust neural networks using Lipschitz boundscited by 98
- 2018Reachability Analysis of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 93
- 2019Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biascited by 93
- 2019Stability and Generalization of Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 81
- 2019Orthogonal Deep Neural Networkscited by 72
- 2020On hallucinations in tomographic image reconstructioncited by 66
- 2022Physics-Driven Deep Learning for Computational Magnetic Resonance Imagingcited by 49
- 2020The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problemscited by 40
- 2020A Benchmark of Medical Out of Distribution Detectioncited by 40
- 2022Almost-Orthogonal Layers for Efficient General-Purpose Lipschitz Networkscited by 39
- 2020On Mean Absolute Error for Deep Neural Network Based Vector-to-Vector Regressioncited by 33
- 2021Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstructioncited by 30
- 2018On Lipschitz Bounds of General Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2020Deep Neural Networks with Trainable Activations and Controlled Lipschitz Constantcited by 25
- 2022Single Model Uncertainty Estimation via Stochastic Data Centeringcited by 20
- 2020Compressible Latent-Space Invertible Networks for Generative Model-Constrained Image Reconstructioncited by 19
- 2020Uncertainty Estimation in Medical Image Denoising with Bayesian Deep Image Priorcited by 18
- 2020XPDNet for MRI Reconstruction: an application to the 2020 fastMRI challengecited by 13
- 2017Lipschitz Properties for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 9
- 2017Deep Learning-Guided Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Datacited by 6
- 2020Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstructioncited by 6
- 2022Distortion-Corrected Image Reconstruction with Deep Learning on an MRI-Linaccited by 6
- 2019dAUTOMAP: decomposing AUTOMAP to achieve scalability and enhance performancecited by 5
- 2021Estimating MRI Image Quality via Image Reconstruction Uncertaintycited by 3
- 2022On Real-time Image Reconstruction with Neural Networks for MRI-guided Radiotherapycited by 3
- 2013Spatially-Adaptive Reconstruction in Computed Tomography using Neural Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.