mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Shared Latent Space by Both Languages in Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2305.03511 ↗First posted 2 May 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-autoregressive neural machine translation (NAT) offers substantial translation speed up compared to autoregressive neural machine translation (AT) at the cost of translation quality. Latent variable modeling has emerged as a promising approach to bridge this quality gap, particularly for addressing the chronic multimodality problem in NAT. In the previous works that used latent variable modeling, they added an auxiliary model to estimate the posterior distribution of the latent variable conditioned on the source and target sentences. However, it causes several disadvantages, such as redundant information extraction in the latent variable, increasing the number of parameters, and a tendency to ignore some information from the inputs. In this paper, we propose a novel latent variable modeling that integrates a dual reconstruction perspective and an advanced hierarchical latent modeling with a shared intermediate latent space across languages. This latent variable modeling hypothetically alleviates or prevents the above disadvantages. In our experiment results, we present comprehensive demonstrations that our proposed approach infers superior latent variables which lead better translation quality. Finally, in the benchmark translation tasks, such as WMT, we demonstrate that our proposed method significantly improves translation quality compared to previous NAT baselines including the state-of-the-art NAT model.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2023.

Builds on

40 of 59 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  4. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  7. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  8. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  9. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  10. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  11. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  12. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
28 more
  1. 2016Ladder Variational Autoencoderscited by 315
  2. 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
  3. 2018Deterministic Non-Autoregressive Neural Sequence Modeling by Iterative Refinementcited by 194
  4. 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
  5. 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 146
  6. 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
  7. 2020Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 99
  8. 2019FlowSeq: Non-Autoregressive Conditional Sequence Generation with Generative Flowcited by 89
  9. 2018End-to-End Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Connectionist Temporal Classificationcited by 72
  10. 2022A Survey on Non-Autoregressive Generation for Neural Machine Translation and Beyondcited by 64
  11. 2019Latent-Variable Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Deterministic Inference Using a Delta Posteriorcited by 58
  12. 2019Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Auxiliary Regularizationcited by 52
  13. 2022Directed Acyclic Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 44
  14. 2019Guiding Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation Decoding with Reordering Informationcited by 37
  15. 2016Variational Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  16. 2021Rejuvenating Low-Frequency Words: Making the Most of Parallel Data in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 34
  17. 2018Variational Recurrent Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
  18. 2018Joint Training for Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 20
  19. 2022textitlatent-GLAT: Glancing at Latent Variables for Parallel Text Generationcited by 20
  20. 2022One Reference Is Not Enough: Diverse Distillation with Reference Selection for Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 20
  21. 2019Syntactically Supervised Transformers for Faster Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
  22. 2022Non-Monotonic Latent Alignments for CTC-Based Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 16
  23. 2018Auto-Encoding Variational Neural Machine Translationcited by 11
  24. 2023Fuzzy Alignments in Directed Acyclic Graph for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 11
  25. 2018Explaining and Generalizing Back-Translation through Wake-Sleepcited by 7
  26. 2018Generative Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
  27. 2020Variational Neural Machine Translation with Normalizing Flowscited by 7
  28. 2020Dual Reconstruction: a Unifying Objective for Semi-Supervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.