Low-Resource Multi-Granularity Academic Function Recognition Based on Multiple Prompt Knowledge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs), e.g., SciBERT, generally requires large numbers of annotated data to achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of NLP tasks in the scientific domain. However, obtaining the fine-tune data for scientific NLP task is still challenging and expensive. Inspired by recent advancement in prompt learning, in this paper, we propose the Mix Prompt Tuning (MPT), which is a semi-supervised method to alleviate the dependence on annotated data and improve the performance of multi-granularity academic function recognition tasks with a small number of labeled examples. Specifically, the proposed method provides multi-perspective representations by combining manual prompt templates with automatically learned continuous prompt templates to help the given academic function recognition task take full advantage of knowledge in PLMs. Based on these prompt templates and the fine-tuned PLM, a large number of pseudo labels are assigned to the unlabeled examples. Finally, we fine-tune the PLM using the pseudo training set. We evaluate our method on three academic function recognition tasks of different granularity including the citation function, the abstract sentence function, and the keyword function, with datasets from computer science domain and biomedical domain. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method and statistically significant improvements against strong baselines. In particular, it achieves an average increase of 5% in Macro-F1 score compared with fine-tuning, and 6% in Macro-F1 score compared with other semi-supervised method under low-resource settings. In addition, MPT is a general method that can be easily applied to other low-resource scientific classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.
Builds on
43 of 81 references.
References · 43
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
31 more
- 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
- 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 505
- 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
- 2021Pre-Trained Models: Past, Present and Futurecited by 319
- 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 308
- 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 249
- 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
- 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
- 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 187
- 2021Knowledgeable Prompt-tuning: Incorporating Knowledge into Prompt Verbalizer for Text Classificationcited by 183
- 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
- 2019Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publicationscited by 130
- 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 124
- 2020Automatically Identifying Words That Can Serve as Labels for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 98
- 2019Few-shot Text Classification with Distributional Signaturescited by 58
- 2022Prototypical Verbalizer for Prompt-based Few-shot Tuningcited by 53
- 2021FlipDA: Effective and Robust Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Learningcited by 32
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Networks for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Scientific Abstractscited by 22
- 2021A Search Engine for Discovery of Scientific Challenges and Directionscited by 12
- 2016Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification in Medical Paper Abstractscited by 10
- 2021Knowledge-Aware Meta-learning for Low-Resource Text Classificationcited by 10
- 2020Semi-Supervised Models via Data Augmentationfor Classifying Interactive Affective Responsescited by 5
- 2022Which structure of academic articles do referees pay more attention to?: perspective of peer review and full-text of academic articlescited by 5
- 2016Citation Classification for Behavioral Analysis of a Scientific Fieldcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.