mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Weakly-Supervised Hate Speech Classification Across Datasets

arXiv 2305.02637 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As pointed out by several scholars, current research on hate speech (HS) recognition is characterized by unsystematic data creation strategies and diverging annotation schemata. Subsequently, supervised-learning models tend to generalize poorly to datasets they were not trained on, and the performance of the models trained on datasets labeled using different HS taxonomies cannot be compared. To ease this problem, we propose applying extremely weak supervision that only relies on the class name rather than on class samples from the annotated data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of a state-of-the-art weakly-supervised text classification model in various in-dataset and cross-dataset settings. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of the source of poor generalizability of HS classification models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

21 of 61 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  6. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  7. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  8. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  9. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  10. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  11. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  12. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
9 more
  1. 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 299
  2. 2017DOC: Deep Open Classification of Text Documentscited by 109
  3. 2018Weakly-Supervised Neural Text Classificationcited by 66
  4. 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutionscited by 66
  5. 2023A Survey of Code-switching: Linguistic and Social Perspectives for Language Technologiescited by 59
  6. 2020X-Class: Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 45
  7. 2017Recognizing Explicit and Implicit Hate Speech Using a Weakly Supervised Two-path Bootstrapping Approachcited by 17
  8. 2018The Effect of Extremist Violence on Hateful Speech Onlinecited by 17
  9. 2021Seed Word Selection for Weakly-Supervised Text Classification with Unsupervised Error Estimationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.