mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PTP: Boosting Stability and Performance of Prompt Tuning with Perturbation-Based Regularizer

arXiv 2305.02423 ↗First posted 3 May 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies show that prompt tuning can better leverage the power of large language models than fine-tuning on downstream natural language understanding tasks. However, the existing prompt tuning methods have training instability issues, as the variance of scores under different random seeds is quite large. To address this critical problem, we first investigate and find that the loss landscape of vanilla prompt tuning is precipitous when it is visualized, where a slight change of input data can cause a big fluctuation in the loss landscape. This is an essential factor that leads to the instability of prompt tuning. Based on this observation, we introduce perturbation-based regularizers, which can smooth the loss landscape, into prompt tuning. We propose a new algorithm, called Prompt Tuning with Perturbation-based regularizer~(PTP), which can not only alleviate training instability dramatically but also boost the performance of prompt tuning. We design two kinds of perturbation-based regularizers, including random-noise-based and adversarial-based. In particular, our proposed perturbations are flexible on both text space and embedding space. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of our proposed methods in stabilizing the training. Our new algorithms improve the state-of-the-art prompt tuning methods by 1.94% and 2.34% on SuperGLUE and FewGLUE benchmarks, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.

Builds on

39 of 57 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  8. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  9. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  10. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  11. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  12. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
27 more
  1. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  2. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  4. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  5. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  7. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  10. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  11. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  12. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  13. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  14. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
  15. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  16. 2020Large-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation Learningcited by 327
  17. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  18. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
  19. 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
  20. 2020Stabilizing Differentiable Architecture Search via Perturbation-based Regularizationcited by 102
  21. 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
  22. 2021Towards Improving Adversarial Training of NLP Modelscited by 79
  23. 2020A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Data Augmentation Approach for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 72
  24. 2020Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphscited by 58
  25. 2020Searching for a Search Method: Benchmarking Search Algorithms for Generating NLP Adversarial Examplescited by 23
  26. 2020Self-Progressing Robust Trainingcited by 8
  27. 2020TextAttack: Lessons learned in designing Python frameworks for NLPcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: