mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

fairml: A Statistician's Take on Fair Machine Learning Modelling

arXiv 2305.02009 ↗First posted 3 May 2023stat.ML cs.CY cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The adoption of machine learning in applications where it is crucial to ensure fairness and accountability has led to a large number of model proposals in the literature, largely formulated as optimisation problems with constraints reducing or eliminating the effect of sensitive attributes on the response. While this approach is very flexible from a theoretical perspective, the resulting models are somewhat black-box in nature: very little can be said about their statistical properties, what are the best practices in their applied use, and how they can be extended to problems other than those they were originally designed for. Furthermore, the estimation of each model requires a bespoke implementation involving an appropriate solver which is less than desirable from a software engineering perspective. In this paper, we describe the fairml R package which implements our previous work (Scutari, Panero, and Proissl 2022) and related models in the literature. fairml is designed around classical statistical models (generalised linear models) and penalised regression results (ridge regression) to produce fair models that are interpretable and whose properties are well-known. The constraint used to enforce fairness is orthogonal to model estimation, making it possible to mix-and-match the desired model family and fairness definition for each application. Furthermore, fairml provides facilities for model estimation, model selection and validation including diagnostic plots.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  6. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  7. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  8. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  9. 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
  10. 2018Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraintscited by 53
  11. 2017Fair Kernel Learningcited by 39
  12. 2020Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 21
4 more
  1. 2021Elastic Net Regularization Paths for All Generalized Linear Modelscited by 17
  2. 2021Achieving Fairness with a Simple Ridge Penaltycited by 13
  3. 2022Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penaltycited by 11
  4. 2021fairmodels: A Flexible Tool For Bias Detection, Visualization, And Mitigationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.