mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Strategic Resource Selection with Homophilic Agents

arXiv 2305.00843 ↗First posted 1 May 2023cs.GT cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The strategic selection of resources by selfish agents is a classic research direction, with Resource Selection Games and Congestion Games as prominent examples. In these games, agents select available resources and their utility then depends on the number of agents using the same resources. This implies that there is no distinction between the agents, i.e., they are anonymous. We depart from this very general setting by proposing Resource Selection Games with heterogeneous agents that strive for joint resource usage with similar agents. So, instead of the number of other users of a given resource, our model considers agents with different types and the decisive feature is the fraction of same-type agents among the users. More precisely, similarly to Schelling Games, there is a tolerance threshold τ ∈ [0,1] which specifies the agents' desired minimum fraction of same-type agents on a resource. Agents strive to select resources where at least a τ-fraction of those resources' users have the same type as themselves. For τ=1, our model generalizes Hedonic Diversity Games with a peak at 1. For our general model, we consider the existence and quality of equilibria and the complexity of maximizing social welfare. Additionally, we consider a bounded rationality model, where agents can only estimate the utility of a resource, since they only know the fraction of same-type agents on a given resource, but not the exact numbers. Thus, they cannot know the impact a strategy change would have on a target resource. Interestingly, we show that this type of bounded rationality yields favorable game-theoretic properties and specific equilibria closely approximate equilibria of the full knowledge setting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 51 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Schelling Segregation with Strategic Agentscited by 5
  2. 2019Schelling Games on Graphscited by 5
  3. 2019Convergence and Hardness of Strategic Schelling Segregationcited by 5
  4. 2019Individual-Based Stability in Hedonic Diversity Gamescited by 5
  5. 2021Two-Stage Facility Location Games with Strategic Clients and Facilitiescited by 5
  6. 2022Tolerance is Necessary for Stability: Single-Peaked Swap Schelling Gamescited by 5
  7. 2019Hedonic Diversity Gamescited by 4
  8. 2020Topological Influence and Locality in Swap Schelling Gamescited by 4
  9. 2020Modified Schelling Gamescited by 4
  10. 2022Hedonic Diversity Games: A Complexity Picture with More than Two Colorscited by 4
  11. 2020Welfare Guarantees in Schelling Segregationcited by 3
  12. 2021Not all Strangers are the Same: The Impact of Tolerance in Schelling Gamescited by 3
7 more
  1. 2022Strategic Facility Location with Clients that Minimize Total Waiting Timecited by 3
  2. 2014Group Activity Selection Problemcited by 2
  3. 2022Network Creation with Homophilic Agentscited by 2
  4. 2016Group Activity Selection on Social Networkscited by 1
  5. 2017Group Activity Selection on Social Networkscited by 1
  6. 2020Hedonic Expertise Gamescited by 1
  7. 2023Single-Peaked Jump Schelling Gamescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.