mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Embedding Aggregation for Forensic Facial Comparison

arXiv 2305.00352 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2023cs.CV stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In forensic facial comparison, questioned-source images are usually captured in uncontrolled environments, with non-uniform lighting, and from non-cooperative subjects. The poor quality of such material usually compromises their value as evidence in legal matters. On the other hand, in forensic casework, multiple images of the person of interest are usually available. In this paper, we propose to aggregate deep neural network embeddings from various images of the same person to improve performance in facial verification. We observe significant performance improvements, especially for very low-quality images. Further improvements are obtained by aggregating embeddings of more images and by applying quality-weighted aggregation. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach in forensic evaluation settings with the development and validation of score-based likelihood ratio systems and report improvements in Cllr of up to 95% (from 0.249 to 0.012) for CCTV images and of up to 96% (from 0.083 to 0.003) for social media images.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2023.

Builds on

9 of 65 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 389
  2. 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 111
  3. 2021Sample and Computation Redistribution for Efficient Face Detectioncited by 86
  4. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  5. 2016Neural Aggregation Network for Video Face Recognitioncited by 44
  6. 2021About Face: A Survey of Facial Recognition Evaluationcited by 27
  7. 2022Cluster and Aggregate: Face Recognition with Large Probe Setcited by 22
  8. 2022Eight Years of Face Recognition Research: Reproducibility, Achievements and Open Issuescited by 8
  9. 2019Statistical Models in Forensic Voice Comparisoncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.