Can deepfakes be created by novice users?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in machine learning and computer vision have led to the proliferation of Deepfakes. As technology democratizes over time, there is an increasing fear that novice users can create Deepfakes, to discredit others and undermine public discourse. In this paper, we conduct user studies to understand whether participants with advanced computer skills and varying levels of computer science expertise can create Deepfakes of a person saying a target statement using limited media files. We conduct two studies; in the first study (n = 39) participants try creating a target Deepfake in a constrained time frame using any tool they desire. In the second study (n = 29) participants use pre-specified deep learning-based tools to create the same Deepfake. We find that for the first study, 23.1% of the participants successfully created complete Deepfakes with audio and video, whereas, for the second user study, 58.6% of the participants were successful in stitching target speech to the target video. We further use Deepfake detection software tools as well as human examiner-based analysis, to classify the successfully generated Deepfake outputs as fake, suspicious, or real. The software detector classified 80% of the Deepfakes as fake, whereas the human examiners classified 100% of the videos as fake. We conclude that creating Deepfakes is a simple enough task for a novice user given adequate tools and time; however, the resulting Deepfakes are not sufficiently real-looking and are unable to completely fool detection software as well as human examiners
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.
Builds on
21 of 47 references.
References · 21
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
- 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
- 2020First Order Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 698
- 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 669
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2019FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactmentcited by 319
- 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 246
9 more
- 2020DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detectioncited by 231
- 2019FaceShifter: Towards High Fidelity And Occlusion Aware Face Swappingcited by 221
- 2020A Review on Generative Adversarial Networks: Algorithms, Theory, and Applicationscited by 209
- 2020DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping frameworkcited by 129
- 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 118
- 2019Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Surveycited by 102
- 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
- 2018RSGAN: Face Swapping and Editing using Face and Hair Representation in Latent Spacescited by 50
- 2021Towards Solving the DeepFake Problem : An Analysis on Improving DeepFake Detection using Dynamic Face Augmentationcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.