The Systematic Review-lution: A Manifesto to Promote Rigour and Inclusivity in Research Synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is maturing. Systematic reviews, a staple of many disciplines, play an important and often essential role in how each field contributes to human knowledge. On this prospect, we argue that our meta-level approach to research within HCI needs a revolution. First, we echo previous calls for greater rigour in primary research reporting with a view towards supporting knowledge synthesis in secondary research. Second, we must decide as a community how to carry out systematic review work in light of the many ways that knowledge is produced within HCI (rigour in secondary research methods and epistemological inclusivity). In short, our manifesto is this: we need to develop and make space for an inclusive but rigorous set of standards that supports systematic review work in HCI, through careful consideration of both primary and secondary research methods, expectations, and infrastructure. We call for any and all fellow systematic review-lutionaries to join us.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Qualitative Approaches to Voice UXcited by 1
- 2025ChatGPT and U(X): A Rapid Review on Measuring the User Experiencecited by 1
- 2025ChatGPT and U(X): A Rapid Review on Measuring the User Experience20 Mar 2025
- 2024Qualitative Approaches to Voice UX23 Apr 2024