mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Case for Hierarchical Deep Learning Inference at the Network Edge

arXiv 2304.11763 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2023cs.DC cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Resource-constrained Edge Devices (EDs), e.g., IoT sensors and microcontroller units, are expected to make intelligent decisions using Deep Learning (DL) inference at the edge of the network. Toward this end, there is a significant research effort in developing tinyML models - Deep Learning (DL) models with reduced computation and memory storage requirements - that can be embedded on these devices. However, tinyML models have lower inference accuracy. On a different front, DNN partitioning and inference offloading techniques were studied for distributed DL inference between EDs and Edge Servers (ESs). In this paper, we explore Hierarchical Inference (HI), a novel approach proposed by Vishnu et al. 2023, arXiv:2304.00891v1 , for performing distributed DL inference at the edge. Under HI, for each data sample, an ED first uses a local algorithm (e.g., a tinyML model) for inference. Depending on the application, if the inference provided by the local algorithm is incorrect or further assistance is required from large DL models on edge or cloud, only then the ED offloads the data sample. At the outset, HI seems infeasible as the ED, in general, cannot know if the local inference is sufficient or not. Nevertheless, we present the feasibility of implementing HI for machine fault detection and image classification applications. We demonstrate its benefits using quantitative analysis and argue that using HI will result in low latency, bandwidth savings, and energy savings in edge AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2023.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  6. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  7. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  8. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  9. 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
  10. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 434
  11. 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 378
  12. 2019Edge AI: On-Demand Accelerating Deep Neural Network Inference via Edge Computingcited by 152
6 more
  1. 2021MLPerf Tiny Benchmarkcited by 124
  2. 2017Hello Edge: Keyword Spotting on Microcontrollerscited by 110
  3. 2017Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloadingcited by 53
  4. 2019SpArSe: Sparse Architecture Search for CNNs on Resource-Constrained Microcontrollerscited by 52
  5. 2022Towards Battery-Free Machine Learning and Inference in Underwater Environmentscited by 9
  6. 2023Online Algorithms for Hierarchical Inference in Deep Learning applications at the Edgecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.