mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can ChatGPT-like Generative Models Guarantee Factual Accuracy? On the Mistakes of New Generation Search Engines

arXiv 2304.11076 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although large conversational AI models such as OpenAI's ChatGPT have demonstrated great potential, we question whether such models can guarantee factual accuracy. Recently, technology companies such as Microsoft and Google have announced new services which aim to combine search engines with conversational AI. However, we have found numerous mistakes in the public demonstrations that suggest we should not easily trust the factual claims of the AI models. Rather than criticizing specific models or companies, we hope to call on researchers and developers to improve AI models' transparency and factual correctness.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2023.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  3. 2017Toward Controlled Generation of Textcited by 271
  4. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 11; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: