LUNA: A Model-Based Universal Analysis Framework for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has had great success recently and is being used in a wide range of academic and industrial fields. More recently, LLMs have made rapid advancements that have propelled AI to a new level, enabling even more diverse applications and industrial domains with intelligence, particularly in areas like software engineering and natural language processing. Nevertheless, a number of emerging trustworthiness concerns and issues exhibited in LLMs have already recently received much attention, without properly solving which the widespread adoption of LLMs could be greatly hindered in practice. The distinctive characteristics of LLMs, such as the self-attention mechanism, extremely large model scale, and autoregressive generation schema, differ from classic AI software based on CNNs and RNNs and present new challenges for quality analysis. Up to the present, it still lacks universal and systematic analysis techniques for LLMs despite the urgent industrial demand. Towards bridging this gap, we initiate an early exploratory study and propose a universal analysis framework for LLMs, LUNA, designed to be general and extensible, to enable versatile analysis of LLMs from multiple quality perspectives in a human-interpretable manner. In particular, we first leverage the data from desired trustworthiness perspectives to construct an abstract model as an auxiliary analysis asset, which is empowered by various abstract model construction methods. To assess the quality of the abstract model, we collect and define a number of evaluation metrics, aiming at both abstract model level and the semantics level. Then, the semantics, which is the degree of satisfaction of the LLM w.r.t. the trustworthiness perspective, is bound to and enriches the abstract model with semantics, which enables more detailed analysis applications for diverse purposes.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 171 of its 258 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2023.
Builds on
171 of 258 references.
References · 171
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
38 more
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
- 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 876
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 774
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2019CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Searchcited by 638
50 most cited of 171 All 171 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Artcited by 17
- 2025Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent Approachcited by 14
- 2024Online Safety Analysis for LLMs: a Benchmark, an Assessment, and a Path Forwardcited by 5
- 2025TRUSTVIS: A Multi-Dimensional Trustworthiness Evaluation Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025TRUSTVIS: A Multi-Dimensional Trustworthiness Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models15 Oct 2025
- 2025Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent Approach24 May 2025
- 2024Online Safety Analysis for LLMs: a Benchmark, an Assessment, and a Path Forward12 Apr 2024
- 2024Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Art25 Mar 2024