mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Benchmarks for Cross-modal Image-text Retrieval

arXiv 2304.10824 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.MMcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image-text retrieval, as a fundamental and important branch of information retrieval, has attracted extensive research attentions. The main challenge of this task is cross-modal semantic understanding and matching. Some recent works focus more on fine-grained cross-modal semantic matching. With the prevalence of large scale multimodal pretraining models, several state-of-the-art models (e.g. X-VLM) have achieved near-perfect performance on widely-used image-text retrieval benchmarks, i.e. MSCOCO-Test-5K and Flickr30K-Test-1K. In this paper, we review the two common benchmarks and observe that they are insufficient to assess the true capability of models on fine-grained cross-modal semantic matching. The reason is that a large amount of images and texts in the benchmarks are coarse-grained. Based on the observation, we renovate the coarse-grained images and texts in the old benchmarks and establish the improved benchmarks called MSCOCO-FG and Flickr30K-FG. Specifically, on the image side, we enlarge the original image pool by adopting more similar images. On the text side, we propose a novel semi-automatic renovation approach to refine coarse-grained sentences into finer-grained ones with little human effort. Furthermore, we evaluate representative image-text retrieval models on our new benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We also analyze the capability of models on fine-grained semantic comprehension through extensive experiments. The results show that even the state-of-the-art models have much room for improvement in fine-grained semantic understanding, especially in distinguishing attributes of close objects in images. Our code and improved benchmark datasets are publicly available at: https://github.com/cwj1412/MSCOCO-Flikcr30K_FG, which we hope will inspire further in-depth research on cross-modal retrieval.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2023.

Builds on

29 of 52 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  7. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  8. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  9. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  10. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  12. 2019Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-trainingcited by 451
17 more
  1. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
  2. 2020Large-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation Learningcited by 327
  3. 2021An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language Transformerscited by 271
  4. 2021Multi-Grained Vision Language Pre-Training: Aligning Texts with Visual Conceptscited by 256
  5. 2020UNIMO: Towards Unified-Modal Understanding and Generation via Cross-Modal Contrastive Learningcited by 239
  6. 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 235
  7. 2020ERNIE-ViL: Knowledge Enhanced Vision-Language Representations Through Scene Graphcited by 211
  8. 2021Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation Learningcited by 187
  9. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  10. 2021RedCaps: web-curated image-text data created by the people, for the peoplecited by 180
  11. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  12. 2016Dual Attention Networks for Multimodal Reasoning and Matchingcited by 114
  13. 2019CAMP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Message Passing for Text-Image Retrievalcited by 110
  14. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  15. 2019Cross-modal Scene Graph Matching for Relationship-aware Image-Text Retrievalcited by 66
  16. 2019Focus Your Attention: A Bidirectional Focal Attention Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 49
  17. 2019Position Focused Attention Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 45

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Cross-Modal Retrieval: A Systematic Review of Methods and Future Directions
  2. 2026Variational Adapter for Cross-modal Similarity Representation
  3. 2026CrossModalQA: A Cross-modal and Multi-hop Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval-augmented Generation
  4. 2024FiCo-ITR: bridging fine-grained and coarse-grained image-text retrieval for comparative performance analysis
  5. 2026Beyond Global Similarity: Towards Fine-Grained, Multi-Condition Multimodal Retrieval
  6. 2024Caption-Matching: A Multimodal Approach for Cross-Domain Image Retrieval
  7. 2026Concepts Complement Dense Semantics: Learning Compact Sparse Spaces for Text-Image Retrieval
  8. 2024Generative Cross-Modal Retrieval: Memorizing Images in Multimodal Language Models for Retrieval and Beyond