mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a Benchmark for Scientific Understanding in Humans and Machines

arXiv 2304.10327 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2023cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific understanding is a fundamental goal of science, allowing us to explain the world. There is currently no good way to measure the scientific understanding of agents, whether these be humans or Artificial Intelligence systems. Without a clear benchmark, it is challenging to evaluate and compare different levels of and approaches to scientific understanding. In this Roadmap, we propose a framework to create a benchmark for scientific understanding, utilizing tools from philosophy of science. We adopt a behavioral notion according to which genuine understanding should be recognized as an ability to perform certain tasks. We extend this notion by considering a set of questions that can gauge different levels of scientific understanding, covering information retrieval, the capability to arrange information to produce an explanation, and the ability to infer how things would be different under different circumstances. The Scientific Understanding Benchmark (SUB), which is formed by a set of these tests, allows for the evaluation and comparison of different approaches. Benchmarking plays a crucial role in establishing trust, ensuring quality control, and providing a basis for performance evaluation. By aligning machine and human scientific understanding we can improve their utility, ultimately advancing scientific understanding and helping to discover new insights within machines.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.

Builds on

15 of 68 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
  7. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  8. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  9. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 214
  10. 2017Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 186
  11. 2018Learning to Ask Good Questions: Ranking Clarification Questions using Neural Expected Value of Perfect Informationcited by 110
  12. 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
3 more
  1. 2021Scientific Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 60
  2. 2023AI and the FCI: Can ChatGPT Project an Understanding of Introductory Physics?cited by 13
  3. 2022SAIBench: Benchmarking AI for Sciencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

9 papers.