SATA: Source Anchoring and Target Alignment Network for Continual Test Time Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adapting a trained model to perform satisfactorily on continually changing testing domains/environments is an important and challenging task. In this work, we propose a novel framework, SATA, which aims to satisfy the following characteristics required for online adaptation: 1) can work seamlessly with different (preferably small) batch sizes to reduce latency; 2) should continue to work well for the source domain; 3) should have minimal tunable hyper-parameters and storage requirements. Given a pre-trained network trained on source domain data, the proposed SATA framework modifies the batch-norm affine parameters using source anchoring based self-distillation. This ensures that the model incorporates the knowledge of the newly encountered domains, without catastrophically forgetting about the previously seen ones. We also propose a source-prototype driven contrastive alignment to ensure natural grouping of the target samples, while maintaining the already learnt semantic information. Extensive evaluation on three benchmark datasets under challenging settings justify the effectiveness of SATA for real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.
Builds on
39 of 51 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
27 more
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
- 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 682
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
- 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
- 2022Generalized Category Discoverycited by 209
- 2021SelfReg: Self-supervised Contrastive Regularization for Domain Generalizationcited by 189
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
- 2021Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 176
- 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
- 2020Self-Distillation Amplifies Regularization in Hilbert Spacecited by 171
- 2021Model Adaptation: Historical Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 152
- 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
- 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
- 2018Snapshot Distillation: Teacher-Student Optimization in One Generationcited by 99
- 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
- 2022Attracting and Dispersing: A Simple Approach for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 93
- 2014Domain-Adversarial Neural Networkscited by 78
- 2021Cross-domain Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 75
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2021VDM-DA: Virtual Domain Modeling for Source Data-free Domain Adaptationcited by 69
- 2022XCon: Learning with Experts for Fine-grained Category Discoverycited by 50
- 2019Revisiting Knowledge Distillation via Label Smoothing Regularizationcited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 58
- 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 55
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
- 2024Variational Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
- 2024Controllable Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 6
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2024CONTRAST: Continual Multi-source Adaptation to Dynamic Distributionscited by 0
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Entropy Sensitivity-Guidance in Strict Online Settingcited by 0
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Entropy Sensitivity-Guidance in Strict Online Setting30 Aug 2026
- 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directions9 Jul 2026
- 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Survey6 Nov 2024
- 2024Controllable Continual Test-Time Adaptation23 May 2024
- 2024Variational Continual Test-Time Adaptation13 Feb 2024
- 2024CONTRAST: Continual Multi-source Adaptation to Dynamic Distributions4 Jan 2024
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Survey31 Oct 2023
- 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptation7 Jun 2023