mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MetaBEV: Solving Sensor Failures for BEV Detection and Map Segmentation

arXiv 2304.09801 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perception systems in modern autonomous driving vehicles typically take inputs from complementary multi-modal sensors, e.g., LiDAR and cameras. However, in real-world applications, sensor corruptions and failures lead to inferior performances, thus compromising autonomous safety. In this paper, we propose a robust framework, called MetaBEV, to address extreme real-world environments involving overall six sensor corruptions and two extreme sensor-missing situations. In MetaBEV, signals from multiple sensors are first processed by modal-specific encoders. Subsequently, a set of dense BEV queries are initialized, termed meta-BEV. These queries are then processed iteratively by a BEV-Evolving decoder, which selectively aggregates deep features from either LiDAR, cameras, or both modalities. The updated BEV representations are further leveraged for multiple 3D prediction tasks. Additionally, we introduce a new M2oE structure to alleviate the performance drop on distinct tasks in multi-task joint learning. Finally, MetaBEV is evaluated on the nuScenes dataset with 3D object detection and BEV map segmentation tasks. Experiments show MetaBEV outperforms prior arts by a large margin on both full and corrupted modalities. For instance, when the LiDAR signal is missing, MetaBEV improves 35.5% detection NDS and 17.7% segmentation mIoU upon the vanilla BEVFusion model; and when the camera signal is absent, MetaBEV still achieves 69.2% NDS and 53.7% mIoU, which is even higher than previous works that perform on full-modalities. Moreover, MetaBEV performs fairly against previous methods in both canonical perception and multi-task learning settings, refreshing state-of-the-art nuScenes BEV map segmentation with 70.4% mIoU.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2023.

Builds on

36 of 41 references.

References · 36

  1. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  4. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  6. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  8. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  9. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  10. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  11. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
  12. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
24 more
  1. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,213
  2. 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,040
  3. 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 844
  4. 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 721
  5. 2021DETR3D: 3D Object Detection from Multi-view Images via 3D-to-2D Queriescited by 655
  6. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  7. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 464
  8. 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
  9. 2019Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detectioncited by 350
  10. 2022BEVFusion: A Simple and Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion Frameworkcited by 334
  11. 2019CondConv: Conditionally Parameterized Convolutions for Efficient Inferencecited by 273
  12. 2022DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detectioncited by 224
  13. 2022Unifying Voxel-based Representation with Transformer for 3D Object Detectioncited by 202
  14. 2022FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detectioncited by 194
  15. 2021Multimodal Virtual Point 3D Detectioncited by 166
  16. 2020EPNet: Enhancing Point Features with Image Semantics for 3D Object Detectioncited by 164
  17. 2022M2BEV: Multi-Camera Joint 3D Detection and Segmentation with Unified Birds-Eye View Representationcited by 155
  18. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  19. 2021Sparse is Enough in Scaling Transformerscited by 86
  20. 2022Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 49
  21. 2022X-Align: Cross-Modal Cross-View Alignment for Bird's-Eye-View Segmentationcited by 38
  22. 2021Revitalizing CNN Attentions via Transformers in Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 34
  23. 2023Soft Neighbors are Positive Supporters in Contrastive Visual Representation Learningcited by 18
  24. 2022CO^3: Cooperative Unsupervised 3D Representation Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: