User Perceptions of Automatic Fake News Detection: Can Algorithms Fight Online Misinformation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fake news detection algorithms apply machine learning to various news attributes and their relationships. However, their success is usually evaluated based on how the algorithm performs on a static benchmark, independent of real users. On the other hand, studies of user trust in fake news has identified relevant factors such as the user's previous beliefs, the article format, and the source's reputation. We present a user study (n=40) evaluating how warnings issued by fake news detection algorithms affect the user's ability to detect misinformation. We find that such warnings strongly influence users' perception of the truth, that even a moderately accurate classifier can improve overall user accuracy, and that users tend to be biased towards agreeing with the algorithm, even when it is incorrect.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Evidence-Driven Retrieval Augmented Response Generation for Online Misinformationcited by 32
- 2024Think Fast, Think Slow, Think Critical: Designing an Automated Propaganda Detection Toolcited by 10
- 2023Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?cited by 3
- 2024Evidence-Driven Retrieval Augmented Response Generation for Online Misinformation22 Mar 2024
- 2024Think Fast, Think Slow, Think Critical: Designing an Automated Propaganda Detection Tool29 Feb 2024
- 2023Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?1 Nov 2023