mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OpenAL: Evaluation and Interpretation of Active Learning Strategies

arXiv 2304.05246 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the vast body of literature on Active Learning (AL), there is no comprehensive and open benchmark allowing for efficient and simple comparison of proposed samplers. Additionally, the variability in experimental settings across the literature makes it difficult to choose a sampling strategy, which is critical due to the one-off nature of AL experiments. To address those limitations, we introduce OpenAL, a flexible and open-source framework to easily run and compare sampling AL strategies on a collection of realistic tasks. The proposed benchmark is augmented with interpretability metrics and statistical analysis methods to understand when and why some samplers outperform others. Last but not least, practitioners can easily extend the benchmark by submitting their own AL samplers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2023.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  3. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 554
  4. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  5. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
  6. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  7. 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 89
  8. 2018Practical Obstacles to Deploying Active Learningcited by 68
  9. 2019OpenML-Python: an extensible Python API for OpenMLcited by 63
  10. 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 54
  11. 2016A Benchmark and Comparison of Active Learning for Logistic Regressioncited by 36
  12. 2021Active learning for structural reliability: survey, general framework and benchmarkcited by 15
3 more
  1. 2019Limitations of Assessing Active Learning Performance at Runtimecited by 6
  2. 2020Rebuilding Trust in Active Learning with Actionable Metricscited by 4
  3. 2021Sample Noise Impact on Active Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.