mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RD-DPP: Rate-Distortion Theory Meets Determinantal Point Process to Diversify Learning Data Samples

arXiv 2304.04137 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In some practical learning tasks, such as traffic video analysis, the number of available training samples is restricted by different factors, such as limited communication bandwidth and computation power. Determinantal Point Process (DPP) is a common method for selecting the most diverse samples to enhance learning quality. However, the number of selected samples is restricted to the rank of the kernel matrix implied by the dimensionality of data samples. Secondly, it is not easily customizable to different learning tasks. In this paper, we propose a new way of measuring task-oriented diversity based on the Rate-Distortion (RD) theory, appropriate for multi-level classification. To this end, we establish a fundamental relationship between DPP and RD theory. We observe that the upper bound of the diversity of data selected by DPP has a universal trend of textitphase transition, which suggests that DPP is beneficial only at the beginning of sample accumulation. This led to the design of a bi-modal method, where RD-DPP is used in the first mode to select initial data samples, then classification inconsistency (as an uncertainty measure) is used to select the subsequent samples in the second mode. This phase transition solves the limitation to the rank of the similarity matrix. Applying our method to six different datasets and five benchmark models suggests that our method consistently outperforms random selection, DPP-based methods, and alternatives like uncertainty-based and coreset methods under all sampling budgets, while exhibiting high generalizability to different learning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2023.

Builds on

22 of 54 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  6. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  7. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
  8. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  9. 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
  10. 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
  11. 2020Learning Diverse and Discriminative Representations via the Principle of Maximal Coding Rate Reductioncited by 141
  12. 2020Determinantal Point Processes in Randomized Numerical Linear Algebracited by 41
10 more
  1. 2021Continuum: Simple Management of Complex Continual Learning Scenarioscited by 33
  2. 2022In Defense of Core-set: A Density-aware Core-set Selection for Active Learningcited by 26
  3. 2019Exact sampling of determinantal point processes with sublinear time preprocessingcited by 19
  4. 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
  5. 2020Sampling from a k-DPP without looking at all itemscited by 17
  6. 2018Fast determinantal point processes via distortion-free intermediate samplingcited by 13
  7. 2018Wireless Data Acquisition for Edge Learning: Data-Importance Aware Retransmissioncited by 10
  8. 2021Submodular Mutual Information for Targeted Data Subset Selectioncited by 8
  9. 2019Minimum-Margin Active Learningcited by 6
  10. 2022Lazy and Fast Greedy MAP Inference for Determinantal Point Processcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.