Representer Theorems for Metric and Preference Learning: Geometric Insights and Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop a mathematical framework to address a broad class of metric and preference learning problems within a Hilbert space. We obtain a novel representer theorem for the simultaneous task of metric and preference learning. Our key observation is that the representer theorem for this task can be derived by regularizing the problem with respect to the norm inherent in the task structure. For the general task of metric learning, our framework leads to a simple and self-contained representer theorem and offers new geometric insights into the derivation of representer theorems for this task. In the case of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHSs), we illustrate how our representer theorem can be used to express the solution of the learning problems in terms of finite kernel terms similar to classical representer theorems. Lastly, our representer theorem leads to a novel nonlinear algorithm for metric and preference learning. We compare our algorithm against challenging baseline methods on real-world rank inference benchmarks, where it achieves competitive performance. Notably, our approach significantly outperforms vanilla ideal point methods and surpasses strong baselines across multiple datasets. Code available at: https://github.com/PeymanMorteza/Metric-Preference-Learning-RKHS
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.
Builds on
11 of 46 references.
References · 11
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2013A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Datacited by 58
- 2016Finite Sample Prediction and Recovery Bounds for Ordinal Embeddingcited by 12
- 2020Simultaneous Preference and Metric Learning from Paired Comparisonscited by 10
- 2022Spectral, Probabilistic, and Deep Metric Learning: Tutorial and Surveycited by 10
- 2014Spectral Ranking using Seriationcited by 9
- 2017Learning Low-Dimensional Metricscited by 9
- 2020Spectral Ranking with Covariatescited by 8
- 2018As you like it: Localization via paired comparisonscited by 6
- 2022One for All: Simultaneous Metric and Preference Learning over Multiple Userscited by 6
- 2020Spectral Methods for Ranking with Scarce Datacited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.