mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Mitigating the Utility-Loss in Differentially Private Learning: A new Perspective by a Geometrically Inspired Kernel Approach

arXiv 2304.01300 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-utility tradeoff remains as one of the fundamental issues of differentially private machine learning. This paper introduces a geometrically inspired kernel-based approach to mitigate the accuracy-loss issue in classification. In this approach, a representation of the affine hull of given data points is learned in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS). This leads to a novel distance measure that hides privacy-sensitive information about individual data points and improves the privacy-utility tradeoff via significantly reducing the risk of membership inference attacks. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated through experiments on MNIST dataset, Freiburg groceries dataset, and a real biomedical dataset. It is verified that the approach remains computationally practical. The application of the approach to federated learning is considered and it is observed that the accuracy-loss due to data being distributed is either marginal or not significantly high.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2023.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 445
  3. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  4. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 187
  5. 2017FALKON: An Optimal Large Scale Kernel Methodcited by 84
  6. 2021Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space, Mercer's Theorem, Eigenfunctions, Nystr"om Method, and Use of Kernels in Machine Learning: Tutorial and Surveycited by 37
  7. 2016Variational Bayes In Private Settings (VIPS)cited by 9
  8. 2018Optimal Noise-Adding Mechanism in Additive Differential Privacycited by 8
  9. 2021Membership-Mappings for Data Representation Learning: Measure Theoretic Conceptualizationcited by 5
  10. 2021Differentially Private Transferrable Deep Learning with Membership-Mappingscited by 5
  11. 2018The Deep Kernelized Autoencodercited by 3
  12. 2022Membership-Mappings for Practical Secure Distributed Deep Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inference
  2. 2023DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning
  3. 2022A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning
  4. 2025Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Data Publication: A Bilevel Optimization Framework with Curvature-Guided Perturbation
  5. 2024Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleading
  6. 2025Federated One-Shot Learning with Data Privacy and Objective-Hiding
  7. 2025An Improved Privacy and Utility Analysis of Differentially Private SGD with Bounded Domain and Smooth Losses
  8. 2026Revisiting the Provable-Auditable Privacy Gap of DP-SGD