Variational Bayes In Private Settings (VIPS)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many applications of Bayesian data analysis involve sensitive information, motivating methods which ensure that privacy is protected. We introduce a general privacy-preserving framework for Variational Bayes (VB), a widely used optimization-based Bayesian inference method. Our framework respects differential privacy, the gold-standard privacy criterion, and encompasses a large class of probabilistic models, called the Conjugate Exponential (CE) family. We observe that we can straightforwardly privatise VB's approximate posterior distributions for models in the CE family, by perturbing the expected sufficient statistics of the complete-data likelihood. For a broadly-used class of non-CE models, those with binomial likelihoods, we show how to bring such models into the CE family, such that inferences in the modified model resemble the private variational Bayes algorithm as closely as possible, using the Polya-Gamma data augmentation scheme. The iterative nature of variational Bayes presents a further challenge since iterations increase the amount of noise needed. We overcome this by combining: (1) an improved composition method for differential privacy, called the moments accountant, which provides a tight bound on the privacy cost of multiple VB iterations and thus significantly decreases the amount of additive noise; and (2) the privacy amplification effect of subsampling mini-batches from large-scale data in stochastic learning. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in CE and non-CE models including latent Dirichlet allocation, Bayesian logistic regression, and sigmoid belief networks, evaluated on real-world datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 40
- 2021Differentially Private Bayesian Neural Networks on Accuracy, Privacy and Reliabilitycited by 6
- 2023On Mitigating the Utility-Loss in Differentially Private Learning: A new Perspective by a Geometrically Inspired Kernel Approachcited by 3
- 2023Differentially Private Normalizing Flows for Density Estimation, Data Synthesis, and Variational Inference with Application to Electronic Health Recordscited by 2
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inferencecited by 1
- 2021Differentially private stochastic expectation propagation (DP-SEP)cited by 1
- 2023Differentially Private Statistical Inference through β-Divergence One Posterior Samplingcited by 1
- 2026Computation-Utility-Privacy Tradeoffs in Bayesian Estimationcited by 1
- 2026Computation-Utility-Privacy Tradeoffs in Bayesian Estimation18 Mar 2026
- 2023Differentially Private Statistical Inference through β-Divergence One Posterior Sampling11 Jul 2023
- 2023On Mitigating the Utility-Loss in Differentially Private Learning: A new Perspective by a Geometrically Inspired Kernel Approach3 Apr 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Normalizing Flows for Density Estimation, Data Synthesis, and Variational Inference with Application to Electronic Health Records11 Feb 2023
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing24 Feb 2022
- 2021Differentially private stochastic expectation propagation (DP-SEP)25 Nov 2021
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inference27 Oct 2021
- 2021Differentially Private Bayesian Neural Networks on Accuracy, Privacy and Reliability18 Jul 2021
- 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time4 Jul 2021