mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conveying Autonomous Robot Capabilities through Contrasting Behaviour Summaries

arXiv 2304.00367 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2023cs.RO cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As advances in artificial intelligence enable increasingly capable learning-based autonomous agents, it becomes more challenging for human observers to efficiently construct a mental model of the agent's behaviour. In order to successfully deploy autonomous agents, humans should not only be able to understand the individual limitations of the agents but also have insight on how they compare against one another. To do so, we need effective methods for generating human interpretable agent behaviour summaries. Single agent behaviour summarization has been tackled in the past through methods that generate explanations for why an agent chose to pick a particular action at a single timestep. However, for complex tasks, a per-action explanation may not be able to convey an agents global strategy. As a result, researchers have looked towards multi-timestep summaries which can better help humans assess an agents overall capability. More recently, multi-step summaries have also been used for generating contrasting examples to evaluate multiple agents. However, past approaches have largely relied on unstructured search methods to generate summaries and require agents to have a discrete action space. In this paper we present an adaptive search method for efficiently generating contrasting behaviour summaries with support for continuous state and action spaces. We perform a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of the summaries for helping humans discern the superior autonomous agent for a given task. Our results indicate that adaptive search can efficiently identify informative contrasting scenarios that enable humans to accurately select the better performing agent with a limited observation time budget.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2023.

Builds on

13 of 23 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  2. 2018Crowd-Robot Interaction: Crowd-aware Robot Navigation with Attention-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 162
  3. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  4. 2017Socially Aware Motion Planning with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 128
  5. 2016Decentralized Non-communicating Multiagent Collision Avoidance with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 104
  6. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
  7. 2019Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitationscited by 50
  8. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 47
  9. 2020Decentralized Structural-RNN for Robot Crowd Navigation with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
  10. 2017Enabling Robots to Communicate their Objectivescited by 34
  11. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing with Reward Augmentation for Autonomous Vehicle Validationcited by 33
  12. 2021"I Don't Think So": Summarizing Policy Disagreements for Agent Comparisoncited by 6
1 more
  1. 2021Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.