mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Evidential Transactions with Cyberlogic

arXiv 2304.00060 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2023cs.CR cs.AI cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cyberlogic is an enabling logical foundation for building and analyzing digital transactions that involve the exchange of digital forms of evidence. It is based on an extension of (first-order) intuitionistic predicate logic with an attestation and a knowledge modality. The key ideas underlying Cyberlogic are extremely simple, as (1) public keys correspond to authorizations, (2) transactions are specified as distributed logic programs, and (3) verifiable evidence is collected by means of distributed proof search. Verifiable evidence, in particular, are constructed from extra-logical elements such as signed documents and cryptographic signatures. Despite this conceptual simplicity of Cyberlogic, central features of authorization policies including trust, delegation, and revocation of authority are definable. An expressive temporal-epistemic logic for specifying distributed authorization policies and protocols is therefore definable in Cyberlogic using a trusted time source. We describe the distributed execution of Cyberlogic programs based on the hereditary Harrop fragment in terms of distributed proof search, and we illustrate some fundamental issues in the distributed construction of certificates. The main principles of encoding and executing cryptographic protocols in Cyberlogic are demonstrated. Finally, a functional encryption scheme is proposed for checking certificates of evidential transactions when policies are kept private.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

Builds on

5 of 65 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021Fast and Reliable Formal Verification of Smart Contracts with the Move Provercited by 4
  2. 2022Towards an Accountable and Reproducible Federated Learning: A FactSheets Approachcited by 3
  3. 2022Systems Challenges for Trustworthy Embodied Systemscited by 2
  4. 2018The Curses of Blockchain Decentralizationcited by 1
  5. 2018Pluralize: a Trustworthy Framework for High-Level Smart Contract-Draftcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.