Rethinking interpretation: Input-agnostic saliency mapping of deep visual classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Saliency methods provide post-hoc model interpretation by attributing input features to the model outputs. Current methods mainly achieve this using a single input sample, thereby failing to answer input-independent inquiries about the model. We also show that input-specific saliency mapping is intrinsically susceptible to misleading feature attribution. Current attempts to use 'general' input features for model interpretation assume access to a dataset containing those features, which biases the interpretation. Addressing the gap, we introduce a new perspective of input-agnostic saliency mapping that computationally estimates the high-level features attributed by the model to its outputs. These features are geometrically correlated, and are computed by accumulating model's gradient information with respect to an unrestricted data distribution. To compute these features, we nudge independent data points over the model loss surface towards the local minima associated by a human-understandable concept, e.g., class label for classifiers. With a systematic projection, scaling and refinement process, this information is transformed into an interpretable visualization without compromising its model-fidelity. The visualization serves as a stand-alone qualitative interpretation. With an extensive evaluation, we not only demonstrate successful visualizations for a variety of concepts for large-scale models, but also showcase an interesting utility of this new form of saliency mapping by identifying backdoor signatures in compromised classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2023.
Builds on
27 of 37 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
15 more
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
- 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
- 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
- 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
- 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
- 2020There and Back Again: Revisiting Backpropagation Saliency Methodscited by 60
- 2016Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networkscited by 54
- 2021Deep Learning-Based Autonomous Driving Systems: A Survey of Attacks and Defensescited by 29
- 2021CAMERAS: Enhanced Resolution And Sanity preserving Class Activation Mapping for image saliencycited by 28
- 2021Interpretable deep-learning models to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 18
- 2022A Survey of Neural Trojan Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learningcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.