mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neglected Free Lunch -- Learning Image Classifiers Using Annotation Byproducts

arXiv 2303.17595 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised learning of image classifiers distills human knowledge into a parametric model through pairs of images and corresponding labels (X,Y). We argue that this simple and widely used representation of human knowledge neglects rich auxiliary information from the annotation procedure, such as the time-series of mouse traces and clicks left after image selection. Our insight is that such annotation byproducts Z provide approximate human attention that weakly guides the model to focus on the foreground cues, reducing spurious correlations and discouraging shortcut learning. To verify this, we create ImageNet-AB and COCO-AB. They are ImageNet and COCO training sets enriched with sample-wise annotation byproducts, collected by replicating the respective original annotation tasks. We refer to the new paradigm of training models with annotation byproducts as learning using annotation byproducts (LUAB). We show that a simple multitask loss for regressing Z together with Y already improves the generalisability and robustness of the learned models. Compared to the original supervised learning, LUAB does not require extra annotation costs. ImageNet-AB and COCO-AB are at https://github.com/naver-ai/NeglectedFreeLunch.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2023.

Builds on

73 of 118 references.

References · 73

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  11. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  12. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
38 more
  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  3. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  5. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  6. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  7. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  9. 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,215
  10. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  12. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  13. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  14. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  15. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
  16. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  17. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  18. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  19. 2015What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervisioncited by 297
  20. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  21. 201912-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learningcited by 278
  22. 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 245
  23. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  24. 2019Connecting Vision and Language with Localized Narrativescited by 225
  25. 2021Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learningcited by 218
  26. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  27. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
  28. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  29. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  30. 2020Evaluating Weakly Supervised Object Localization Methods Rightcited by 104
  31. 2020On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 98
  32. 2018NSML: Meet the MLaaS platform with a real-world case studycited by 70
  33. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human Annotationscited by 62
  34. 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
  35. 2018Training Classifiers with Natural Language Explanationscited by 58
  36. 2017How hard can it be? Estimating the difficulty of visual search in an imagecited by 52
  37. 2018Not Using the Car to See the Sidewalk: Quantifying and Controlling the Effects of Context in Classification and Segmentationcited by 49
  38. 2020Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attentioncited by 45

50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.