The Full Rights Dilemma for A.I. Systems of Debatable Personhood
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An Artificially Intelligent system (an AI) has debatable personhood if it's epistemically possible either that the AI is a person or that it falls far short of personhood. Debatable personhood is a likely outcome of AI development and might arise soon. Debatable AI personhood throws us into a catastrophic moral dilemma: Either treat the systems as moral persons and risk sacrificing real human interests for the sake of entities without interests worth the sacrifice, or don't treat the systems as moral persons and risk perpetrating grievous moral wrongs against them. The moral issues become even more perplexing if we consider cases of possibly conscious AI that are subhuman, superhuman, or highly divergent from us in their morally relevant properties.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.
Builds on
2 of 70 references.
References · 2
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Artificial Intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning won't fix itcited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.