Fairness-Aware Data Valuation for Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data valuation is a ML field that studies the value of training instances towards a given predictive task. Although data bias is one of the main sources of downstream model unfairness, previous work in data valuation does not consider how training instances may influence both performance and fairness of ML models. Thus, we propose Fairness-Aware Data vauatiOn (FADO), a data valuation framework that can be used to incorporate fairness concerns into a series of ML-related tasks (e.g., data pre-processing, exploratory data analysis, active learning). We propose an entropy-based data valuation metric suited to address our two-pronged goal of maximizing both performance and fairness, which is more computationally efficient than existing metrics. We then show how FADO can be applied as the basis for unfairness mitigation pre-processing techniques. Our methods achieve promising results -- up to a 40 p.p. improvement in fairness at a less than 1 p.p. loss in performance compared to a baseline -- and promote fairness in a data-centric way, where a deeper understanding of data quality takes center stage.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2023.
Builds on
19 of 42 references.
References · 19
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 165
- 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
- 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
- 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
- 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 80
- 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 40
7 more
- 2016A Benchmark and Comparison of Active Learning for Logistic Regressioncited by 36
- 2018Domain Adaptive Transfer Learning with Specialist Modelscited by 31
- 2021Data Shapley Valuation for Efficient Batch Active Learningcited by 27
- 2022Data Debugging with Shapley Importance over End-to-End Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 17
- 2022Understanding Unfairness in Fraud Detection through Model and Data Bias Interactionscited by 7
- 2021Active learning for imbalanced data under cold startcited by 5
- 2022Prisoners of Their Own Devices: How Models Induce Data Bias in Performative Predictioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Improving Rule-based Reasoning in LLMs using Neurosymbolic Representationscited by 3
- 2024LossVal: Efficient Data Valuation for Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasetscited by 1
- 2024Neural Dynamic Data Valuation via Stochastic State-Adjoint Trajectoriescited by 0
- 2025Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets17 Jun 2025
- 2025Improving Rule-based Reasoning in LLMs using Neurosymbolic Representations31 Jan 2025
- 2024LossVal: Efficient Data Valuation for Neural Networks5 Dec 2024
- 2024Neural Dynamic Data Valuation via Stochastic State-Adjoint Trajectories30 Apr 2024