mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Writing Assistants Should Model Social Factors of Language

arXiv 2303.16275 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.HCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intelligent writing assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) are more popular today than ever before, but their further widespread adoption is precluded by sub-optimal performance. In this position paper, we argue that a major reason for this sub-optimal performance and adoption is a singular focus on the information content of language while ignoring its social aspects. We analyze the different dimensions of these social factors in the context of writing assistants and propose their incorporation into building smarter, more effective, and truly personalized writing assistants that would enrich the user experience and contribute to increased user adoption.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2023.

Builds on

6 of 22 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 249
  2. 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 196
  3. 2014Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Changecited by 82
  4. 2022Read, Revise, Repeat: A System Demonstration for Human-in-the-loop Iterative Text Revisioncited by 46
  5. 2022Improving Iterative Text Revision by Learning Where to Edit from Other Revision Taskscited by 20
  6. 2015Freshman or Fresher? Quantifying the Geographic Variation of Internet Languagecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

5 papers.