mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated wildlife image classification: An active learning tool for ecological applications

arXiv 2303.15823 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2023cs.CV stat.APcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Wildlife camera trap images are being used extensively to investigate animal abundance, habitat associations, and behavior, which is complicated by the fact that experts must first classify the images manually. Artificial intelligence systems can take over this task but usually need a large number of already-labeled training images to achieve sufficient performance. This requirement necessitates human expert labor and poses a particular challenge for projects with few cameras or short durations. We propose a label-efficient learning strategy that enables researchers with small or medium-sized image databases to leverage the potential of modern machine learning, thus freeing crucial resources for subsequent analyses. Our methodological proposal is two-fold: (1) We improve current strategies of combining object detection and image classification by tuning the hyperparameters of both models. (2) We provide an active learning (AL) system that allows training deep learning models very efficiently in terms of required human-labeled training images. We supply a software package that enables researchers to use these methods directly and thereby ensure the broad applicability of the proposed framework in ecological practice. We show that our tuning strategy improves predictive performance. We demonstrate how the AL pipeline reduces the amount of pre-labeled data needed to achieve a specific predictive performance and that it is especially valuable for improving out-of-sample predictive performance. We conclude that the combination of tuning and AL increases predictive performance substantially. Furthermore, we argue that our work can broadly impact the community through the ready-to-use software package provided. Finally, the publication of our models tailored to European wildlife data enriches existing model bases mostly trained on data from Africa and North America.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2023.

Builds on

15 of 47 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  2. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  3. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  5. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  6. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 419
  7. 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 145
  8. 2021Seeing biodiversity: perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservationcited by 130
  9. 2019Efficient Pipeline for Camera Trap Image Reviewcited by 79
  10. 2018Past, Present, and Future Approaches Using Computer Vision for Animal Re-Identification from Camera Trap Datacited by 46
  11. 2019A deep active learning system for species identification and counting in camera trap imagescited by 44
  12. 2016Towards Automatic Wild Animal Monitoring: Identification of Animal Species in Camera-trap Images using Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
3 more
  1. 2019Half a Percent of Labels is Enough: Efficient Animal Detection in UAV Imagery using Deep CNNs and Active Learningcited by 22
  2. 2021Iterative Human and Automated Identification of Wildlife Imagescited by 22
  3. 2021Application of deep learning to camera trap data for ecologists in planning / engineering -- Can captivity imagery train a model which generalises to the wild?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

11 papers.