PIAT: Parameter Interpolation based Adversarial Training for Image Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training has been demonstrated to be the most effective approach to defend against adversarial attacks. However, existing adversarial training methods show apparent oscillations and overfitting issue in the training process, degrading the defense efficacy. In this work, we propose a novel framework, termed Parameter Interpolation based Adversarial Training (PIAT), that makes full use of the historical information during training. Specifically, at the end of each epoch, PIAT tunes the model parameters as the interpolation of the parameters of the previous and current epochs. Besides, we suggest to use the Normalized Mean Square Error (NMSE) to further improve the robustness by aligning the clean and adversarial examples. Compared with other regularization methods, NMSE focuses more on the relative magnitude of the logits rather than the absolute magnitude. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets and various networks show that our method could prominently improve the model robustness and reduce the generalization error. Moreover, our framework is general and could further boost the robust accuracy when combined with other adversarial training methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2023.
Builds on
26 of 32 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
14 more
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 109
- 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 94
- 2020Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Trainingcited by 93
- 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
- 2022Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and Beyondcited by 50
- 2019Robust Local Features for Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Trainingcited by 30
- 2022Squeeze Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.