mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Importance of Signer Overlap for Sign Language Detection

arXiv 2303.10782 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sign language detection, identifying if someone is signing or not, is becoming crucially important for its applications in remote conferencing software and for selecting useful sign data for training sign language recognition or translation tasks. We argue that the current benchmark data sets for sign language detection estimate overly positive results that do not generalize well due to signer overlap between train and test partitions. We quantify this with a detailed analysis of the effect of signer overlap on current sign detection benchmark data sets. Comparing accuracy with and without overlap on the DGS corpus and Signing in the Wild, we observed a relative decrease in accuracy of 4.17% and 6.27%, respectively. Furthermore, we propose new data set partitions that are free of overlap and allow for more realistic performance assessment. We hope this work will contribute to improving the accuracy and generalization of sign language detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2023.

Builds on

5 of 22 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fieldscited by 1,162
  2. 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
  3. 2021Including Signed Languages in Natural Language Processingcited by 68
  4. 2022Signing at Scale: Learning to Co-Articulate Signs for Large-Scale Photo-Realistic Sign Language Productioncited by 61
  5. 2020Real-Time Sign Language Detection using Human Pose Estimationcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.