Reclaiming the Digital Commons: A Public Data Trust for Training Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Democratization of AI means not only that people can freely use AI, but also that people can collectively decide how AI is to be used. In particular, collective decision-making power is required to redress the negative externalities from the development of increasingly advanced AI systems, including degradation of the digital commons and unemployment from automation. The rapid pace of AI development and deployment currently leaves little room for this power. Monopolized in the hands of private corporations, the development of the most capable foundation models has proceeded largely without public input. There is currently no implemented mechanism for ensuring that the economic value generated by such models is redistributed to account for their negative externalities. The citizens that have generated the data necessary to train models do not have input on how their data are to be used. In this work, we propose that a public data trust assert control over training data for foundation models. In particular, this trust should scrape the internet as a digital commons, to license to commercial model developers for a percentage cut of revenues from deployment. First, we argue in detail for the existence of such a trust. We also discuss feasibility and potential risks. Second, we detail a number of ways for a data trust to incentivize model developers to use training data only from the trust. We propose a mix of verification mechanisms, potential regulatory action, and positive incentives. We conclude by highlighting other potential benefits of our proposed data trust and connecting our work to ongoing efforts in data and compute governance.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5.
7 papers.
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 79
- 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AIcited by 73
- 2024Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commonscited by 46
- 2024Proving membership in LLM pretraining data via data watermarkscited by 40
- 2024Public Domain 12M: A Highly Aesthetic Image-Text Dataset with Novel Governance Mechanismscited by 15
- 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasetscited by 2
- 2024Public Domain 12M: A Highly Aesthetic Image-Text Dataset with Novel Governance Mechanisms30 Oct 2024
- 2024Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons20 Jul 2024
- 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasets10 Jun 2024
- 2024Proving membership in LLM pretraining data via data watermarks16 Feb 2024
- 2024Visibility into AI Agents23 Jan 2024
- 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AI25 Oct 2023
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul 2023