Continuous Risk Measures for Driving Support
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we compare three different model-based risk measures by evaluating their stengths and weaknesses qualitatively and testing them quantitatively on a set of real longitudinal and intersection scenarios. We start with the traditional heuristic Time-To-Collision (TTC), which we extend towards 2D operation and non-crash cases to retrieve the Time-To-Closest-Encounter (TTCE). The second risk measure models position uncertainty with a Gaussian distribution and uses spatial occupancy probabilities for collision risks. We then derive a novel risk measure based on the statistics of sparse critical events and so-called survival conditions. The resulting survival analysis shows to have an earlier detection time of crashes and less false positive detections in near-crash and non-crash cases supported by its solid theoretical grounding. It can be seen as a generalization of TTCE and the Gaussian method which is suitable for the validation of ADAS and AD.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2023.
Builds on
2 of 18 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.