Bounding the Probabilities of Benefit and Harm Through Sensitivity Parameters and Proxies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present two methods for bounding the probabilities of benefit and harm under unmeasured confounding. The first method computes the (upper or lower) bound of either probability as a function of the observed data distribution and two intuitive sensitivity parameters which, then, can be presented to the analyst as a 2-D plot to assist her in decision making. The second method assumes the existence of a measured nondifferential proxy (i.e., direct effect) of the unmeasured confounder. Using this proxy, tighter bounds than the existing ones can be derived from just the observed data distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2023.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2013Probabilities of Causation: Bounds and Identificationcited by 90
- 2021Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population datacited by 37
- 2022Personalized Decision Making -- A Conceptual Introductioncited by 30
- 2022Probabilities of Causation with Nonbinary Treatment and Effectcited by 24
- 2021Unit Selection with Causal Diagramcited by 17
- 2020On the Monotonicity of a Nondifferentially Mismeasured Binary Confoundercited by 6
- 2021Simple yet Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Same Predictions, Different Harms: Causal Auditing of Patient World Models4 Oct 2026
- 2026Path-specific harm decomposition: A partial identification framework24 Sep 2026
- 2023On the Probability of Immunity21 Sep 2023