Client-specific Property Inference against Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning has become a widely used paradigm for collaboratively training a common model among different participants with the help of a central server that coordinates the training. Although only the model parameters or other model updates are exchanged during the federated training instead of the participant's data, many attacks have shown that it is still possible to infer sensitive information such as membership, property, or outright reconstruction of participant data. Although differential privacy is considered an effective solution to protect against privacy attacks, it is also criticized for its negative effect on utility. Another possible defense is to use secure aggregation which allows the server to only access the aggregated update instead of each individual one, and it is often more appealing because it does not degrade model quality. However, combining only the aggregated updates, which are generated by a different composition of clients in every round, may still allow the inference of some client-specific information. In this paper, we show that simple linear models can effectively capture client-specific properties only from the aggregated model updates due to the linearity of aggregation. We formulate an optimization problem across different rounds in order to infer a tested property of every client from the output of the linear models, for example, whether they have a specific sample in their training data (membership inference) or whether they misbehave and attempt to degrade the performance of the common model by poisoning attacks. Our reconstruction technique is completely passive and undetectable. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on several scenarios which shows that secure aggregation provides very limited privacy guarantees in practice. The source code will be released upon publication.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.
Builds on
39 of 78 references.
References · 39
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2019Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networkscited by 387
27 more
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 225
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 161
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
- 2018Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGDcited by 95
- 2018Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?cited by 93
- 2019Cronus: Robust and Heterogeneous Collaborative Learning with Black-Box Knowledge Transfercited by 93
- 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 90
- 2022DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep Model Inspectioncited by 81
- 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 73
- 2022Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient Leakagecited by 72
- 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 67
- 2019Differential Privacy-enabled Federated Learning for Sensitive Health Datacited by 44
- 2021Gradient Disaggregation: Breaking Privacy in Federated Learning by Reconstructing the User Participant Matrixcited by 43
- 2021A Federated Learning Aggregation Algorithm for Pervasive Computing: Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 31
- 2021User-Level Label Leakage from Gradients in Federated Learningcited by 21
- 2020VFL: A Verifiable Federated Learning with Privacy-Preserving for Big Data in Industrial IoTcited by 18
- 2020MTAdam: Automatic Balancing of Multiple Training Loss Termscited by 13
- 2022Towards Verifiable Federated Learningcited by 11
- 2020Federated Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Privacy-Aware Document Visual Question Answeringcited by 17
- 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspectivecited by 7
- 2024Secure Aggregation is Not Private Against Membership Inference Attackscited by 6
- 2024Analyzing Inference Privacy Risks Through Gradients in Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challengescited by 4
- 2024NeurIPS 2023 Competition: Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Document VQAcited by 2
- 2024Unraveling Attacks in Machine Learning-based IoT Ecosystems: A Survey and the Open Libraries Behind Themcited by 0
- 2025Label Leakage in Federated Inertial-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Robust Federated Learning via Byzantine Filtering over Encrypted Updatescited by 0
- 2026Robust Federated Learning via Byzantine Filtering over Encrypted Updates5 Feb 2026
- 2025Label Leakage in Federated Inertial-based Human Activity Recognition27 May 2025
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challenges10 Mar 2025
- 2024NeurIPS 2023 Competition: Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Document VQA6 Nov 2024
- 2024Analyzing Inference Privacy Risks Through Gradients in Machine Learning29 Aug 2024
- 2024Secure Aggregation is Not Private Against Membership Inference Attacks26 Mar 2024
- 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspective6 Feb 2024
- 2024Unraveling Attacks in Machine Learning-based IoT Ecosystems: A Survey and the Open Libraries Behind Them22 Jan 2024
- 2023Privacy-Aware Document Visual Question Answering15 Dec 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SMTFL: Secure Model Training to Untrusted Participants in Federated Learning
- 2022Reconciling Security and Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning
- 2023Privacy and Accuracy Implications of Model Complexity and Integration in Heterogeneous Federated Learning
- 2023FedBayes: A Zero-Trust Federated Learning Aggregation to Defend Against Adversarial Attacks
- 2025Privacy Preserving and Robust Aggregation for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Non-IID Settings
- 2024FedAA: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective on Adaptive Aggregation for Fair and Robust Federated Learning
- 2024Privacy in Federated Learning
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey