mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-resolution Interpretation and Diagnostics Tool for Natural Language Classifiers

arXiv 2303.03542 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing explainability methods for Natural Language Processing (NLP) models is a challenging task, for two main reasons. First, the high dimensionality of the data (large number of tokens) results in low coverage and in turn small contributions for the top tokens, compared to the overall model performance. Second, owing to their textual nature, the input variables, after appropriate transformations, are effectively binary (presence or absence of a token in an observation), making the input-output relationship difficult to understand. Common NLP interpretation techniques do not have flexibility in resolution, because they usually operate at word-level and provide fully local (message level) or fully global (over all messages) summaries. The goal of this paper is to create more flexible model explainability summaries by segments of observation or clusters of words that are semantically related to each other. In addition, we introduce a root cause analysis method for NLP models, by analyzing representative False Positive and False Negative examples from different segments. At the end, we illustrate, using a Yelp review data set with three segments (Restaurant, Hotel, and Beauty), that exploiting group/cluster structures in words and/or messages can aid in the interpretation of decisions made by NLP models and can be utilized to assess the model's sensitivity or bias towards gender, syntax, and word meanings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2023.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  2. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  3. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
  4. 2018iNNvestigate neural networks!cited by 58
  5. 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
  6. 2021Explanation-Based Human Debugging of NLP Models: A Surveycited by 53
  7. 2018Interpreting Black Box Predictions using Fisher Kernelscited by 48
  8. 2018Locally Interpretable Models and Effects based on Supervised Partitioning (LIME-SUP)cited by 19
  9. 2020Practical and Ethical Considerations in the Effective use of Emotion and Sentiment Lexiconscited by 17
  10. 2021Model Explainability in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processingcited by 14
  11. 2018Model Interpretation: A Unified Derivative-based Framework for Nonparametric Regression and Supervised Machine Learningcited by 3
  12. 2019Text Length Adaptation in Sentiment Classificationcited by 3
1 more
  1. 2020Model-Agnostic Explanations using Minimal Forcing Subsetscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.