mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accelerated Rates between Stochastic and Adversarial Online Convex Optimization

arXiv 2303.03272 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2023cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stochastic and adversarial data are two widely studied settings in online learning. But many optimization tasks are neither i.i.d. nor fully adversarial, which makes it of fundamental interest to get a better theoretical understanding of the world between these extremes. In this work we establish novel regret bounds for online convex optimization in a setting that interpolates between stochastic i.i.d. and fully adversarial losses. By exploiting smoothness of the expected losses, these bounds replace a dependence on the maximum gradient length by the variance of the gradients, which was previously known only for linear losses. In addition, they weaken the i.i.d. assumption by allowing, for example, adversarially poisoned rounds, which were previously considered in the related expert and bandit settings. In the fully i.i.d. case, our regret bounds match the rates one would expect from results in stochastic acceleration, and we also recover the optimal stochastically accelerated rates via online-to-batch conversion. In the fully adversarial case our bounds gracefully deteriorate to match the minimax regret. We further provide lower bounds showing that our regret upper bounds are tight for all intermediate regimes in terms of the stochastic variance and the adversarial variation of the loss gradients.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2023.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  2. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
  3. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  4. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
  5. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
  6. 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
  7. 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
  8. 2021Impossible Tuning Made Possible: A New Expert Algorithm and Its Applicationscited by 52
  9. 2021Achieving Near Instance-Optimality and Minimax-Optimality in Stochastic and Adversarial Linear Bandits Simultaneouslycited by 48
  10. 2016MetaGrad: Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 46
  11. 2020Improved Analysis for Dynamic Regret of Strongly Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 33
  12. 2023A Blackbox Approach to Best of Both Worlds in Bandits and Beyondcited by 29
9 more
  1. 2020Prediction with Corrupted Expert Advicecited by 26
  2. 2021MetaGrad: Adaptation using Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 26
  3. 2013On the Generalization Ability of Online Learning Algorithms for Pairwise Loss Functionscited by 23
  4. 2017A Modular Analysis of Adaptive (Non-)Convex Optimization: Optimism, Composite Objectives, and Variational Boundscited by 23
  5. 2023Optimistic Online Mirror Descent for Bridging Stochastic and Adversarial Online Convex Optimizationcited by 22
  6. 2022Between Stochastic and Adversarial Online Convex Optimization: Improved Regret Bounds via Smoothnesscited by 21
  7. 2021On Optimal Robustness to Adversarial Corruption in Online Decision Problemscited by 20
  8. 2017Accelerating Stochastic Gradient Descent For Least Squares Regressioncited by 13
  9. 2021Optimal Rates for Random Order Online Optimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.