mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ensemble flow reconstruction in the atmospheric boundary layer from spatially limited measurements through latent diffusion models

arXiv 2303.00836 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2023physics.ao-ph cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to costs and practical constraints, field campaigns in the atmospheric boundary layer typically only measure a fraction of the atmospheric volume of interest. Machine learning techniques have previously successfully reconstructed unobserved regions of flow in canonical fluid mechanics problems and two-dimensional geophysical flows, but these techniques have not yet been demonstrated in the three-dimensional atmospheric boundary layer. Here, we conduct a numerical analogue of a field campaign with spatially limited measurements using large-eddy simulation. We pose flow reconstruction as an inpainting problem, and reconstruct realistic samples of turbulent, three-dimensional flow with the use of a latent diffusion model. The diffusion model generates physically plausible turbulent structures on larger spatial scales, even when input observations cover less than 1% of the volume. Through a combination of qualitative visualization and quantitative assessment, we demonstrate that the diffusion model generates meaningfully diverse samples when conditioned on just one observation. These samples successfully serve as initial conditions for a large-eddy simulation code. We find that diffusion models show promise and potential for other applications for other turbulent flow reconstruction problems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 28 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

Builds on

28 of 71 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  6. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  7. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  8. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  9. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
  10. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  11. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  12. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
16 more
  1. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  2. 2022RePaint: Inpainting using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 1,419
  3. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  4. 2021Palette: Image-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 1,296
  5. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  6. 2022Denoising Diffusion Restoration Modelscited by 951
  7. 2022On Distillation of Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 721
  8. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  9. 2022Understanding Diffusion Models: A Unified Perspectivecited by 337
  10. 2021Skillful Precipitation Nowcasting using Deep Generative Models of Radarcited by 308
  11. 2022Brain Imaging Generation with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 267
  12. 2021Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learningcited by 55
  13. 2023Super-Resolution Analysis via Machine Learning: A Survey for Fluid Flowscited by 30
  14. 2020Reconstruction of turbulent data with deep generative models for semantic inpainting from TURB-Rot databasecited by 17
  15. 2020Semi Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder for Flow Reconstruction and Uncertainty Quantification from Limited Observationscited by 13
  16. 2021Adversarial sampling of unknown and high-dimensional conditional distributionscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Guiding diffusion models to reconstruct flow fields from sparse data
  2. 2024Stochastic Reconstruction of Gappy Lagrangian Turbulent Signals by Conditional Diffusion Models
  3. 2022A Physics-informed Diffusion Model for High-fidelity Flow Field Reconstruction
  4. 2025A PDE-Informed Latent Diffusion Model for 2-m Temperature Downscaling
  5. 2025Guided Unconditional and Conditional Generative Models for Super-Resolution and Inference of Quasi-Geostrophic Turbulence
  6. 2026Coupled Diffusion-Encoder Models for Reconstruction of Flow Fields
  7. 2026Patched Flow Matching: Generative Wall-Pressure Reconstruction Beyond Training-Domain Scales from Sparse Sensors
  8. 2025Learning Temporally Consistent Turbulence Between Sparse Snapshots via Diffusion Models