mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Systematic Analysis of Vocabulary and BPE Settings for Optimal Fine-tuning of NMT: A Case Study of In-domain Translation

arXiv 2303.00722 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The effectiveness of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models largely depends on the vocabulary used at training; small vocabularies can lead to out-of-vocabulary problems -- large ones, to memory issues. Subword (SW) tokenization has been successfully employed to mitigate these issues. The choice of vocabulary and SW tokenization has a significant impact on both training and fine-tuning an NMT model. Fine-tuning is a common practice in optimizing an MT model with respect to new data. However, new data potentially introduces new words (or tokens), which, if not taken into consideration, may lead to suboptimal performance. In addition, the distribution of tokens in the new data can differ from the distribution of the original data. As such, the original SW tokenization model could be less suitable for the new data. Through a systematic empirical evaluation, in this work we compare different strategies for SW tokenization and vocabulary generation with the ultimate goal to uncover an optimal setting for fine-tuning a domain-specific model. Furthermore, we developed several (in-domain) models, the best of which achieves 6 BLEU points improvement over the baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

Builds on

15 of 56 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  6. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  7. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  8. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  9. 2016Fast Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
  10. 2017Linguistically Motivated Vocabulary Reduction for Neural Machine Translation from Turkish to Englishcited by 23
  11. 2021Multilingual Domain Adaptation for NMT: Decoupling Language and Domain Information with Adapterscited by 21
  12. 2020Selecting Backtranslated Data from Multiple Sources for Improved Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
3 more
  1. 2021Selecting Parallel In-domain Sentences for Neural Machine Translation Using Monolingual Textscited by 4
  2. 2020Rapid Domain Adaptation for Machine Translation with Monolingual Datacited by 3
  3. 2018Exploring Hyper-Parameter Optimization for Neural Machine Translation on GPU Architecturescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.