mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Fairness in Text Generation via Mutual Information Minimization based on Importance Sampling

arXiv 2302.13136 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pretrained language models (PLMs), such as GPT2, have achieved remarkable empirical performance in text generation tasks. However, pretrained on large-scale natural language corpora, the generated text from PLMs may exhibit social bias against disadvantaged demographic groups. To improve the fairness of PLMs in text generation, we propose to minimize the mutual information between the semantics in the generated text sentences and their demographic polarity, i.e., the demographic group to which the sentence is referring. In this way, the mentioning of a demographic group (e.g., male or female) is encouraged to be independent from how it is described in the generated text, thus effectively alleviating the social bias. Moreover, we propose to efficiently estimate the upper bound of the above mutual information via importance sampling, leveraging a natural language corpus. We also propose a distillation mechanism that preserves the language modeling ability of the PLMs after debiasing. Empirical results on real-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method yields superior performance in term of both fairness and language modeling ability.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2023.

Builds on

23 of 26 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  5. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  6. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  7. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
  8. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  9. 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
  10. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
  11. 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
  12. 2020CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual Informationcited by 233
11 more
  1. 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 232
  2. 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
  3. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  4. 2019Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generationcited by 152
  5. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  6. 2020Towards Controllable Biases in Language Generationcited by 112
  7. 2021Sustainable Modular Debiasing of Language Modelscited by 98
  8. 2019Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 94
  9. 2021FairFil: Contrastive Neural Debiasing Method for Pretrained Text Encoderscited by 75
  10. 2022Mitigating Gender Bias in Distilled Language Models via Counterfactual Role Reversalcited by 40
  11. 2022What do Toothbrushes do in the Kitchen? How Transformers Think our World is Structuredcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.