Causal quartets: Different ways to attain the same average treatment effect
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The average causal effect can often be best understood in the context of its variation. We demonstrate with two sets of four graphs, all of which represent the same average effect but with much different patterns of heterogeneity. As with the famous correlation quartet of Anscombe (1973), these graphs dramatize the way in which real-world variation can be more complex than simple numerical summaries. The graphs also give insight into why the average effect is often much smaller than anticipated.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026This human study did not involve human subjects: Validating LLM simulations as behavioral evidencecited by 29
- 2023Performance is not enough: the story told by a Rashomon quartetcited by 9
- 2024A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systemscited by 2
- 2026Position: Prioritize Identifying Structure, Not Complex Models, for Scientific Discoverycited by 0
- 2026Position: Prioritize Identifying Structure, Not Complex Models, for Scientific Discovery30 May 2026
- 2026This human study did not involve human subjects: Validating LLM simulations as behavioral evidence17 Feb 2026
- 2024A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems5 Aug 2024
- 2023Performance is not enough: the story told by a Rashomon quartet26 Feb 2023