CARE: Collaborative AI-Assisted Reading Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen impressive progress in AI-assisted writing, yet the developments in AI-assisted reading are lacking. We propose inline commentary as a natural vehicle for AI-based reading assistance, and present CARE: the first open integrated platform for the study of inline commentary and reading. CARE facilitates data collection for inline commentaries in a commonplace collaborative reading environment, and provides a framework for enhancing reading with NLP-based assistance, such as text classification, generation or question answering. The extensible behavioral logging allows unique insights into the reading and commenting behavior, and flexible configuration makes the platform easy to deploy in new scenarios. To evaluate CARE in action, we apply the platform in a user study dedicated to scholarly peer review. CARE facilitates the data collection and study of inline commentary in NLP, extrinsic evaluation of NLP assistance, and application prototyping. We invite the community to explore and build upon the open source implementation of CARE.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2023.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
References · 10
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 106
- 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Reviewcited by 37
- 2020Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and Symbolscited by 36
- 2022UKP-SQUARE: An Online Platform for Question Answering Researchcited by 6
- 2022TexPrax: A Messaging Application for Ethical, Real-time Data Collection and Annotationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?cited by 25
- 2025PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviewscited by 22
- 2025Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Reviewcited by 6
- 2026SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Promptscited by 4
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptionscited by 3
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?cited by 2
- 2026Expos'ia: Teaching and Assessment of Academic Writing Skills for Research Project Proposals and Peer Feedbackcited by 1
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptions3 Jun 2026
- 2026SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts29 Apr 2026
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?26 Apr 2026
- 2026Expos'ia: Teaching and Assessment of Academic Writing Skills for Research Project Proposals and Peer Feedback10 Jan 2026
- 2025PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews19 Feb 2025
- 2025Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review16 Feb 2025
- 2024What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?10 May 2024