HL Dataset: Visually-grounded Description of Scenes, Actions and Rationales
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current captioning datasets focus on object-centric captions, describing the visible objects in the image, e.g. "people eating food in a park". Although these datasets are useful to evaluate the ability of Vision & Language models to recognize and describe visual content, they do not support controlled experiments involving model testing or fine-tuning, with more high-level captions, which humans find easy and natural to produce. For example, people often describe images based on the type of scene they depict ('people at a holiday resort') and the actions they perform ('people having a picnic'). Such descriptions draw on personal experience and commonsense assumptions. We present the High-Level Dataset a dataset extending 14997 images from the COCO dataset, aligned with a new set of 134,973 human-annotated (high-level) captions collected along three axes: scenes, actions, and rationales. We further extend this dataset with confidence scores collected from an independent set of readers, as well as a set of narrative captions generated synthetically, by combining each of the three axes. We describe this dataset and analyse it extensively. We also present baseline results for the High-Level Captioning task.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.
Builds on
30 of 51 references.
References · 30
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
18 more
- 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 537
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
- 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 318
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 242
- 2016Visual Storytellingcited by 176
- 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 158
- 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 135
- 2018Generating Counterfactual Explanations with Natural Languagecited by 37
- 2023Visual Writing Prompts: Character-Grounded Story Generation with Curated Image Sequencescited by 31
- 2019What Makes A Good Story? Designing Composite Rewards for Visual Storytellingcited by 29
- 2019Alpaca: Intermittent Execution without Checkpointscited by 10
- 2019Convolutional Auto-encoding of Sentence Topics for Image Paragraph Generationcited by 8
- 2021What Vision-Language Models `See' when they See Scenescited by 8
- 2018A Pipeline for Creative Visual Storytellingcited by 7
- 2022Understanding ME? Multimodal Evaluation for Fine-grained Visual Commonsensecited by 5
- 2022Understanding Cross-modal Interactions in V&L Models that Generate Scene Descriptionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Automatic Metrics in Natural Language Generation: A Survey of Current Evaluation Practicescited by 20
- 2023Interpreting Vision and Language Generative Models with Semantic Visual Priorscited by 2
- 2024Resilience through Scene Context in Visual Referring Expression Generationcited by 2
- 2026Human-Centric Image Captioning with Subject-Centered Spatial Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Human-Centric Image Captioning with Subject-Centered Spatial Understanding8 Sep 2026
- 2024Automatic Metrics in Natural Language Generation: A Survey of Current Evaluation Practices17 Aug 2024
- 2024Resilience through Scene Context in Visual Referring Expression Generation18 Apr 2024
- 2023Interpreting Vision and Language Generative Models with Semantic Visual Priors28 Apr 2023