mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Test-Time Distribution Normalization for Contrastively Learned Vision-language Models

arXiv 2302.11084 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.CL cs.CVcited by 14

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Advances in the field of vision-language contrastive learning have made it possible for many downstream applications to be carried out efficiently and accurately by simply taking the dot product between image and text representations. One of the most representative approaches proposed recently known as CLIP has garnered widespread adoption due to its effectiveness. CLIP is trained with an InfoNCE loss that takes into account both positive and negative samples to help learn a much more robust representation space. This paper reveals that the common downstream practice of taking a dot product is only a zeroth-order approximation of the optimization goal, resulting in a loss of information during test-time. Intuitively, since the model has been optimized based on the InfoNCE loss, test-time procedures should also be in alignment. The question lies in how one can retrieve any semblance of negative samples information during inference in a computationally efficient way. To this end, we propose Distribution Normalization (DN), where we approximate the mean representation of a batch of test samples and use such a mean to represent what would be analogous to negative samples in the InfoNCE loss. DN requires no retraining or fine-tuning and can be effortlessly applied during inference. Extensive experiments on a wide variety of downstream tasks exhibit a clear advantage of DN over the dot product on top of other existing test-time augmentation methods.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 54 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2023.

Builds on

54 of 72 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  2. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  3. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 51

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  9. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  10. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  11. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  12. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
38 more
  1. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  2. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  3. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  4. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
  5. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  6. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  7. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
  8. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  9. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  10. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  11. 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 991
  12. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  13. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  14. 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 641
  15. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  16. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
  17. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
  18. 2019Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-trainingcited by 451
  19. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  20. 2020Large-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation Learningcited by 327
  21. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  22. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
  23. 2020UNIMO: Towards Unified-Modal Understanding and Generation via Cross-Modal Contrastive Learningcited by 239
  24. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
  25. 2019UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learningcited by 228
  26. 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
  27. 2021Multimodal Contrastive Training for Visual Representation Learningcited by 124
  28. 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
  29. 2017AutoDIAL: Automatic DomaIn Alignment Layerscited by 75
  30. 2022Crafting Better Contrastive Views for Siamese Representation Learningcited by 67
  31. 2020Consensus-Aware Visual-Semantic Embedding for Image-Text Matchingcited by 59
  32. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  33. 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
  34. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  35. 2021Momentum Contrastive Voxel-wise Representation Learning for Semi-supervised Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 49
  36. 2021Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioningcited by 40
  37. 2013Some Improvements on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Based Image Classificationcited by 34
  38. 2020NUBIA: NeUral Based Interchangeability Assessor for Text Generationcited by 34

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CLIPTTA: Robust Contrastive Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation
  2. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?
  4. 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
  5. 2026Ramen: Robust Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models with Active Sample Selection
  6. 2026Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Test-Time Prompt Adaptation
  7. 2022CLIP-TD: CLIP Targeted Distillation for Vision-Language Tasks
  8. 2025Post-pre-training for Modality Alignment in Vision-Language Foundation Models